Fruit Pest News
Volume 7, No. 17 July 12, 2006
A weekly, online newsletter whose goal is to update Extension agents and growers of commercial tree fruit and small fruit crops
on diseases and insects in Tennessee.
Text appearing in blue or red can be clicked to link to other web sites. Be aware that much of the linked information is produced in other states and may not be applicable to Tennessee.
In This Issue:
1. Vegetables: Phytophthora Blight Alert
2. Apple: Bitter Rot
3. Peach: Brown Rot
4. Peach: Rhizopus Rot
5. Clearwing Moths
6. Pheromone Trap Catches and Biofixes
Current Conditions
The extended hot, dry weather has been broken by thunderstorms in most areas of the state. More are needed. A chance for showers continues for the next several days.
1. Vegetables: Phytophthora Blight Alert
We have begun seeing cases of Phytophthora blight (P. capsici) on cucurbit crops. If this year is like previous years, we will see more acres affected each year. This disease has serious implications for your ability to grow susceptible crops.
Phytophthora blight is a devastating disease particularly of cucurbit crops and peppers, but also tomatoes, eggplant, snap beans, and lima beans. The destructive nature of the disease and the long life (many years) of an infestation can prevent successful production of susceptible crops for many years. Because of the difficulty of controlling this disease after it occurs, prevention should be emphasized. The action to take when Phytophthora blight is first found in a field depends on the severity of the case. If the blight is widespread throughout a field, attention should be directed to prevention of spread to non-infested fields. Chemical control of Phytophthora blight in such severe cases is not very effective and not generally recommended. Prevention of spread consists of cultural practices such as cleaning equipment after working in an infested field. Certain disease-control products have activity against P. capsici and may be helpful in light cases of Phytophthora blight. Pre-plant soil applications of mefenoxam can suppress root and crown rot phases of the disease, unless resistance to this fungicide develops. Other products are applied as foliar sprays to protect against airborne spores. The most difficult aspect of this disease to control is the fruit rot phase in crops in which the fruit lies on the ground, such as unsupported vine crops. The potential for disease-control products to be successful is highly dependent on the correction of soil drainage problems. Peppers and cucurbit crops are so susceptible to Phytophthora blight that it is risky to plant these crops in fields in which the disease has ever been known to occur. Some degree of control can be achieved with resistant pepper varieties and hard-rind pumpkin varieties, but cultural practices and chemicals would still be needed.
Be on the lookout for this disease, especially in irrigated fields. Dying plants and rotting fruit are the main symptoms. Be wary of borrowing or lending cultivation equipment, as this organism can be introduced into your field on anything that carries soil particles. (SB)
2. Bitter Rot of Apple
Bitter
rot is the most potentially explosive of the apple fruit rot diseases. We sometimes
get reports of growers, especially homeowners, losing the majority of their fruit
to this disease. The restrictions placed on the most effective group of fungicides,
the EBDC's, have increased our problems with bitter rot. The disease can move so
rapidly because infection can occur in as little as 5 hours of wetting at 79-82 F.
At 80 F, lesions can develop and produce spores within 11 days of infection. Fruit
remain susceptible right up until harvest.
Identification. Bitter rot is recognized by round,
sunken lesions on the fruit. When very young fruit are infected, the lesions
appear as tiny gray-brown flecks, which usually do not develop further until fruit
begin to ripen. Fruit infections occurring a month after petal fall begin as small,
round, slightly sunken areas that are light to dark brown in color. As the lesions
enlarge, concentric rings of spores or their fruiting bodies form around the center.
Decay lesions extend in a cone-shaped pattern toward the core, observed by cutting
the apple in half through the decayed area. This V-shaped lesion distinguishes bitter
rot from white rot, which has a cylindrical decayed area.
Cultural
control. A feared disease,
bitter rot is controllable if trees are well-pruned and air circulation is good in
the orchard. The removal of excess growth improves drying conditions and penetration
of sprays into the canopy. Try to prevent the buildup of inoculum by removing overwintered mummified
fruit, if feasible, or even diseased fruit during the growing season. Leaving
fire-blighted shoots on the trees can increase fruit rot problems, because the
fungi can colonize them. Do not allow prunings to pile up near the orchard. Prunings
can be left on the orchard floor if they are chopped with a rotary or flail mower,
which removes the bark on which the fungus can reproduce.
Monitoring bitter rot. Orchards should be scouted regularly
for this and other fruit rots. In orchards in which this disease has been a problem,
or in highly susceptible varieties, inspect the trees each week, beginning in early
June. Highly susceptible varieties include Golden Delicious, Fuji, Arkansas Black,
Granny Smith, Empire, and Yellow Newton. Almost as susceptible are Gala, Stayman,
Jonagold, Jonathan, Grimes Golden, Ginger Gold, and Braeburn. Among the least susceptible
are Delicious, Rome Beauty, and Winesap, but no variety has a high level of resistance.
Inspect
as many fruit as is practical (this exercise provides another case for keeping trees
trained to a manageable height). If more than 3 infected fruit are observed on any
tree, a change in the control program may be needed. The needed change may be in
the tree training and other cultural practices mentioned above.
Or it may be in the spray program. The spray interval may need to be shortened (especially
if the weather is rainy), the fungicide choice may need to change (a bitter rot fungicide
should be used in each cover spray), or the application method may need adjustments.
Chemical
control. The need for fungicidal protection against bitter rot is greatest from
midseason until harvest, although some fruit infection can occur as early as petal
fall. Where bitter rot has been troublesome in the past, use an EBDC fungicide (Dithane,
Manzate, Penncozeb, or Polyram) as long as the label allows (until 77 days before
harvest). Tank mixing with captan after petal fall will improve control of white
rot and black rot.
Ferbam is also very effective against bitter rot, and can
be used until 7 days before harvest. You can use ferbam if you have some old
product, but it is no longer being produced for used in apples or being marketed
in this area. Ferbam also produces a gray residue that
is unsightly on fruit. Other disadvantages of ferbam are increased cracking on Stayman,
and russeting on certain varieties if ferbam is applied in the pink through first
cover sprays. Russeting is not a problem when ferbam is used after the first cover
spray. Like the EBDC's, ferbam applied alone may not provide adequate control of
white rot or black rot.
Captan, ziram, and thiram are good bitter rot materials,
and should be used at full rate where problems with bitter rot are expected.
The addition of a 1/2 rate of Topsin M helps with control of sooty blotch and
flyspeck, as well as white rot and black rot. The strobilurin fungicides, Flint and Pristine, are
as effective against bitter rot as captan, thiram, and ziram. The strobilurins
are more expensive, but do not require the addition of Topsin M to attain good
control of sooty blotch and flyspeck. Cover sprays should be applied
at 10- to 14-day intervals, using 10-day intervals during wet, rainy periods. (SB)
3. Brown Rot of Peach
Remember
that special attention to brown rot is needed in orchards in which bird or insect
damage is severe, hail damage has occurred, and in which trees are planted closely or are
surrounded by woods. Post-harvest losses to brown rot can be significant, especially if harvested
fruit are not kept cool. Try to minimize post-harvest losses by using care in the
picking and handling of fruit to avoid punctures. Any break in the skin of the fruit
enables brown rot to more easily cause infection.
A good pre-harvest spray
program also minimizes losses at harvest and after harvest. Refer to the June
14, 2006 issue
of Fruit Pest News for information on a recommended spray program for brown
rot.
(SB)
4. Rhizopus Rot of Peach
Rhizopus
rot is a common post-harvest rot of peach that can spread rapidly in containers of
non-cooled fruit. It is characterized by a fluffy, black fungal growth on a rotted
area of the fruit. Before the mold is produced, Rhizopus rot can be detected by an
easy slippage of the skin from the rotting flesh. Skin slippage does not readily
occur over brown rot lesions.
Brown rot fungicides used during the pre-harvest
period are not effective against Rhizopus rot. Botran 75W is somewhat effective,
but should be tank mixed with
a brown rot fungicide and cannot be used within 10 days of harvest. Scholar
50W provides good control of Rhizopus rot, but can only be used after harvest,
as a dip or through spray nozzles in the packing line. As with brown rot control,
avoid puncturing fruit skin, and store harvested fruit at less than 40 F. (SB)
5. Clearwing Moths
I have written about the importance of controlling the dogwood
borer, a pest of various trees including dogwood, pecan, oak, and apple. The peachtree
borer and lesser peachtree borer are clearwing borer pests of Prunus. There are pheromone
traps to monitor for these clearwing borers as well as for the squash vine borer
and the grape root borer. The pheromone that I have used for squash vine borer has
only caught one squash vine borer moth so far this year and none last year. This
pest should start laying its eggs on the cucurbit vines soon after they start to
run, usually in June. Last year I caught grape root borers in the squash vine borer
trap. This year, I caught one squash vine borer and two grape root borers in the
squash vine borer trap on July 7. This is right about when I would expect catching
the grape root borers.
Grape root borers can kill grape vines if left unchecked.
Borers tunnel inside vines at or below ground level. All grapes are susceptible and
there are two control options. Mounding uses layers of soil to make it more difficult
for young larvae to reach the roots or for adults to emerge. Clean cultivation should
be used and soil should be mounded one foot high and about 1.5 feet out from the
base of each mound. These mounds should be out now and taken down between early November
and late December. Alternately, a plastic mulch can be used to cover the soil three
feet from the base of the vines.
Lorsban 4E can be applied to the base of
the grape vine if possible before adult borers emerge and at least 35 days prior
to harvest. Mix 4.5 pints of Lorsban 4E in 100 gallons of water. Apply two quarts
of this dilution to the base of each vine. The spray should not contact fruit or
foliage. Application can be made with flood nozzles and low pressure (40-60 psi).
(FH)
6. Pheromone Trap Catches and Biofixes
Nashville (Davidson County)
Pheromone Trap Catches for 2006
Oriental fruit moth (OFM), redbanded leafroller
(RBLR), obliquebanded leafroller (OBLR), codling moth (CM), grape berry moth (GBM),
variegated leafroller (VLR), black cutworm (BCW), diamondback moth (DBM)
| OFM | RBLR | OBLR | CM | GBM | VLR | BCW | DBM | |
| 3-1 (put out RBLR, OFM, VLR traps) | -- | 0 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| 3-2 | -- | 3* | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| 3-9 | -- | 15 | -- | -- | -- | 0 | -- | -- |
| 3-13 | 0 | 50 | 0 | -- | -- | 0 | -- | -- |
| 3-21 | 0 | 71 | 0 | -- | -- | 0 | -- | -- |
| 3-28 | 0 | 15 | 0 | -- | -- | 0 | -- | -- |
| 3-29 (put out GBM, BCW, & DBM traps) | 0 | 5 | 0 | -- | -- | 0 | -- | -- |
| 3-30 | 0 | 4 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2** |
| 4-4 | 24*** | 34 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 4-6 | 5 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 4-7 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3**** | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4-11 | 12 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 4-17 | 39 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 4-18 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4-24 | 49 | 0 | 14^ | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 4-27 | 9 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 5-3 | 13 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 5-9 | 10 | 1 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5-19 | 5 | 10 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5-31 | 25 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 6-5 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 6-13 | 26 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 6-24 | 20 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 7-7 | 8 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7-11 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
* Biofix for RBLR in Davidson County was March 2.
**Biofix for DBM in Davidson
County was March 30.
***Biofix for OFM in Davidson County is estimated to be April
3.
****Biofix for GBM in Davidson County was April 7.
^Biofix for OBLR in Davidson
County was April 24.
Bradley County Pheromone Trap Catches for 2006
| OFM | CM | |
| 3-29 | 3* | 0 |
| 4-3 | 26 | 0 |
| 4-5 | 0 | 1 |
| 4-10 | 16 | 0 |
| 4-17 | 19 | 5** |
| 4-24 | 17 | 17 |
| 5-1 | 17 | 2 |
| 5-8 | 15 | 1 |
| 5-15 | 2 | 0 |
| 5-29 | 13 | 3 |
*Biofix for OFM in Bradley County on March 29.
**Biofix for CM in Bradley County
on April 13.
Putnam County Pheromone trap Catches for 2006
| OFM | RBLR | OBLR | CM | VLR | |
| 3-21 (put out RBLR & OFM) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| 3-24 | 0 | 0 | -- | -- | -- |
| 3-27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3-31 | 2** | 12* | 0 | 2*** | 0 |
| 4-2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4-7 | 6 | 23 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 4-10 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4-15 | 9 | 60 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| 4-17 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 4-21 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4-28 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| 5-7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| 5-12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5-21 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| 6-13 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6-16 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6-23 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6-30 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7-7 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
*Biofix for RBLR in Putnam County estimated as March 3 (trap not out early enough).
**Biofix
for OFM in Putnam county March 31.
***Waiting to verify biofix for CM, catch probably
too early.
Obion County Pheromone Trap Catches for 2006
| OFM | RBLR | OBLR | CM | VLR | |
| 3-13 | 1 | 49* | 0 | -- | 2*** |
| 3-21 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3-27 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4-3 | 2** | 13 | 0 | 2**** | 0 |
| 4-17 | 1 | 18 | 3^ | 1 | 5 |
| 4-25 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 5-1 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 5-15 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 5-22 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5-29 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 6-13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6-15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6-21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6-27 | 23 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 7-3 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
*Biofix for RBLR in Obion County estimated to be on March 3 (trap not out early
enough).
**Biofix for OFM in Obion County on April 3.
***Waiting to verify
biofix for VLR in Obion County, catch probably too early.
****Waiting to verify
biofix for CM in Obion County, catch probably too early.
^Biofix for OBLR in Obion
County.
Additional Pheromone Trap Catches in Davidson County for 2006
Sod
Webworms (SWW), Armyworm (AW), Squash Vine Borer (SVB), Grape Root Borer (GRB)
| SWW | AW | CL | SVB | GRB | |
| 4-18 | 3* | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4-24 | 15 | 4** | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4-27 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5-3 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5-9 | 52 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5-19 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5-31 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6-5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6-13 | 47 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 7-7 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 7-11 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
*Biofix for SWW in Davidson County for 2006.
**Biofix for AW in Davidson County
for 2006.
Knox County Pheromone Trap Catches for 2006
Tufted Apple Budmoth
(TABM)
| OFM | RBLR | OBLR | CM | VLR | TABM | |
| 5-1 | 40 | 15 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 17 |
| 5-10 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| 5-15 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 6-5 | 9 | 43 | 5 | 1 | 13 | 12 |
| 6-13 | 6 | 79 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 20 |
| 6-19 | 3 | 83 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| 6-27 | 17 | 29 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 2 |
| 7-6 | 11 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| 7-10 | 25 | 22 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
The Fruit Pest News URL is: http://web.utk.edu/~extepp/fpn/fpn.htm
Contacts:
Steve Bost, Professor and Extension Plant Pathologist
Frank Hale, Professor and Extension Entomologist
Both authors available at:
615-832-6802
fax 615-781-2568
Plant and Pest Diagnostic Center
5201 Marchant Drive
Nashville, TN 37211
Copyright 2006 The University of Tennessee. All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced and distributed for nonprofit educational purposes provided that credit is given to University of Tennessee Extension.
Programs in agriculture and natural resources, 4-H youth development, family and consumer sciences, and resource development. University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture and county governments cooperating. UT Extension provides equal opportunities in programs and employment.